↓ Skip to main content

Influence of environmental factors on the growth in culture of a New Zealand strain of the fast-spreading algaHydrodictyon reticulatum (water-net)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Phycology, August 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Influence of environmental factors on the growth in culture of a New Zealand strain of the fast-spreading algaHydrodictyon reticulatum (water-net)
Published in
Journal of Applied Phycology, August 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf02182736
Authors

Ian Hawes, Robert Smith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Computer Science 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,570,428
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#502
of 2,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,899
of 20,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,564 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them