| Title |
How to do an evaluation: pitfalls and traps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10822-007-9166-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul C. D. Hawkins, Gregory L. Warren, A. Geoffrey Skillman, Anthony Nicholls |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 170 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 61 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Professor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 64 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 21 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2014.
All research outputs
#8,616,072
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#421
of 951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,839
of 169,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.