| Title |
Genome skimming herbarium specimens for DNA barcoding and phylogenomics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-018-0300-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chun-Xia Zeng, Peter M. Hollingsworth, Jing Yang, Zheng-Shan He, Zhi-Rong Zhang, De-Zhu Li, Jun-Bo Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 20% |
| Belgium | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 16% |
| Researcher | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 52 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 53 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,448,294
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#53
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,354
of 346,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.