↓ Skip to main content

Cytokines and Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients Undergoing Major Elective Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cytokines and Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients Undergoing Major Elective Surgery
Published in
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, July 2015
DOI 10.1093/gerona/glv083
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarinnapha M. Vasunilashorn, Long Ngo, Sharon K. Inouye, Towia A. Libermann, Richard N. Jones, David C. Alsop, Jamey Guess, Sandra Jastrzebski, Janet E. McElhaney, George A. Kuchel, Edward R. Marcantonio

Abstract

A proinflammatory state has been associated with several age-associated conditions; however, the inflammatory mechanisms of delirium remain poorly characterized. Using the Successful Aging after Elective Surgery Study of adults age ≥70 undergoing major noncardiac surgery, 12 cytokines were measured at four timepoints: preoperative, postanesthesia care unit, postoperative day 2 (POD2) and 30 days later (POD1M). We conducted a nested, longitudinal matched (on age, sex, surgery type, baseline cognition, vascular comorbidity, and Apolipoprotein E genotype) case-control study: delirium cases and no-delirium controls were selected from the overall cohort (N = 566; 24% delirium). Analyses were independently conducted in discovery, replication, and pooled cohorts (39, 36, 75 matched pairs, respectively). Nonparametric signed-rank tests evaluating differences in cytokine levels between matched pairs were used to identify delirium-associated cytokines. In the discovery and replication cohorts, matching variables were similar in cases and controls. Compared to controls, cases had (*p < .05, **p < .01) significantly higher interleukin-6 on POD2 in the discovery, replication, and pooled cohorts (median difference [pg/mL] 50.44**, 20.17*, 39.35**, respectively). In the pooled cohort, cases were higher than controls for interleukin-2 (0.99*, 0.77*, 1.07**, 0.73* at preoperative, postanesthesia care unit, POD2, POD1M, respectively), vascular endothelial growth factor (4.10* at POD2), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (3.10* at POD1M), while cases had lower interleukin-12 at POD1M (-4.24*). In this large, well-characterized cohort assessed at multiple timepoints, we observed an inflammatory signature of delirium involving elevated interleukin-6 at POD2, which may be an important disease marker for delirium. We also observed preliminary evidence for involvement of other cytokines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 106 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Researcher 12 11%
Other 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 31 28%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,167,403
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#347
of 3,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,442
of 274,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#9
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.