You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Speaking valves as part of standard care with tracheostomized mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care unit
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Critical Care, June 2015
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.06.015 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anna-Liisa Sutt, John F. Fraser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
Australia | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 26% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 30% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,474,037
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Critical Care
#1,106
of 2,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,724
of 278,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Critical Care
#16
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.