Title |
Studies on the substrate range of Clostridium kluyveri; the use of propanol and succinate
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Microbiology, April 1985
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00408056 |
Authors |
William R. Kenealy, David M. Waselefsky |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 99 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
Researcher | 12 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 20 | 20% |
Engineering | 13 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Chemical Engineering | 7 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 12% |
Unknown | 30 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,676,666
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#652
of 3,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,758
of 9,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them