| Title |
Constituents of Commiphora rostrata and some of their analogues as maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais repellents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s174275840000789x |
| Authors |
W. Lwande, A. Hassanali, P. G. Mcdowell, L. Moreka, S. K. Nokoe, P. G. Waterman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,773,469
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Tropical Insect Science
#19
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,712
of 131,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Tropical Insect Science
#10
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.