| Title |
The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-007-9589-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sanne M. B. I. Botden, Fawaz Torab, Sonja N. Buzink, Jack J. Jakimowicz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 16% |
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 28 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 41% |
| Engineering | 32 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 8% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,667,162
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#807
of 5,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,753
of 75,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,990 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.