| Title |
The need for microdissectional tumor cell preparation during the molecular genetic analysis of prostate cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Urology, May 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s003450050116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Markus Kuczyk, Jürgen Serth, Carsten Bokemeyer, Stefan Machtens, Jörn Schwede, Roland Herrmann, Ute Paeslack, Michael C. Truss, Ruth Knüchel, Udo Jonas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#958
of 2,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,895
of 36,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.