| Title |
Multiple system degeneration with basophilic inclusions in Japanese ALS patients with FUS mutation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00401-009-0621-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takahisa Tateishi, Toshihiro Hokonohara, Ryo Yamasaki, Shiro Miura, Hitoshi Kikuchi, Akiko Iwaki, Hiroshi Tashiro, Hirokazu Furuya, Yuko Nagara, Yasumasa Ohyagi, Nobuyuki Nukina, Toru Iwaki, Yasuyuki Fukumaki, Jun-ichi Kira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 23% |
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 22% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,570,428
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,371
of 2,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,752
of 166,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.