↓ Skip to main content

Child and family experiences with inborn errors of metabolism: a qualitative interview study with representatives of patient groups

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Child and family experiences with inborn errors of metabolism: a qualitative interview study with representatives of patient groups
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10545-015-9881-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara D. Khangura, Kylie Tingley, Pranesh Chakraborty, Doug Coyle, Jonathan B. Kronick, Anne‐Marie Laberge, Julian Little, Fiona A Miller, John J. Mitchell, Chitra Prasad, Shabnaz Siddiq, Komudi Siriwardena, Rebecca Sparkes, Kathy N. Speechley, Sylvia Stockler, Yannis Trakadis, Brenda J. Wilson, Kumanan Wilson, Beth K. Potter, on behalf of the Canadian Inherited Metabolic Diseases Research Network

Abstract

Patient-centered health care for children with inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) and their families is important and requires an understanding of patient experiences, needs, and priorities. IEM-specific patient groups have emerged as important voices within these rare disease communities and are uniquely positioned to contribute to this understanding. We conducted qualitative interviews with IEM patient group representatives to increase understanding of patient and family experiences, needs, and priorities and inform patient-centered research and care. We developed a sampling frame of patient groups representing IEM disease communities from Canada, the United States, and United Kingdom. With consent, we interviewed participants to explore their views on experiences, needs, and outcomes that are most important to children with IEM and their families. We analyzed the data using a qualitative descriptive approach to identify key themes and sub-themes. We interviewed 18 organizational representatives between February 28 and September 17, 2014, representing 16 IEMs and/or disease categories. Twelve participants voluntarily self-identified as parents and/or were themselves patients. Three key themes emerged from the coded data: managing the uncertainty associated with raising and caring for a child with a rare disease; challenges associated with the affected child's life transitions, and; the collective struggle for improved outcomes and interventions that rare disease communities navigate. Health care providers can support children with IEM and their families by acknowledging and reducing uncertainty, supporting families through children's life transitions, and contributing to rare disease communities' progress toward improved interventions, experiences, and outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 28 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Psychology 7 7%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 31 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,079,260
of 24,291,750 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#152
of 1,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,826
of 267,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,291,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,946 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.