↓ Skip to main content

Amphibians and conservation breeding programmes: do all threatened amphibians belong on the ark?

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Amphibians and conservation breeding programmes: do all threatened amphibians belong on the ark?
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10531-015-0966-9
Authors

Benjamin Tapley, Kay S. Bradfield, Christopher Michaels, Mike Bungard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 23%
Student > Bachelor 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Researcher 17 9%
Other 12 6%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 30 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 50%
Environmental Science 30 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 32 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,930,257
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#432
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,443
of 266,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.