| Title |
Impaired water barrier function in acne vulgaris
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Dermatological Research, February 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01262335 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ayako Yamamoto, Kaoruko Takenouchi, Masaaki Ito |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 25% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,587,666
of 25,149,126 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Dermatological Research
#156
of 1,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,865
of 78,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Dermatological Research
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,149,126 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.