↓ Skip to main content

First Postpubertal Same-Sex Sex in Kinsey’s General and Prison Male Same-Sex Samples: Comparative Analysis and Testing Common Assumptions in Minor–Adult Contacts

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
First Postpubertal Same-Sex Sex in Kinsey’s General and Prison Male Same-Sex Samples: Comparative Analysis and Testing Common Assumptions in Minor–Adult Contacts
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10508-018-1196-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce Rind

Abstract

Kinsey's prison male same-sex sample (consisting of prisoners who were gay, bisexual, or had had extensive postpubertal same-sex sex regardless of sexual attractions) was compared with Kinsey's general (i.e., non-prison) same-sex sample (previously analyzed by Rind and Welter, 2016) in terms of reactions to and characteristics of first postpubertal same-sex sex, with a focus on minor-adult contacts. Prison participants had a minor-adult contact as their first postpubertal same-sex sex twice as often as general participants, and their experience involved penetration in three-quarters of cases compared to only half the time for general participants, and it was paid for (i.e., prostitution) three times as often. Despite these differences, reactions to these events by prison and general participants were the same, with combined results of 66% positive reactions (i.e., enjoyed it "much") versus 15% emotionally negative reactions (e.g., shock, disgust, guilt). Results added to those from a series of studies done since 2000 using male same-sex samples in showing that minor-adult same-sex sexual experiences in this population do not conform to the child sexual abuse (CSA) model of trauma and harm. Comparing prison and general participants also showed that the CSA-trauma-crime link often claimed (i.e., where minor-adult sex is said to produce trauma that leads to later criminal behavior) did not hold in the Kinsey same-sex samples, because trauma (the middle element) was mostly missing. This null result for the link alerts that trauma needs to be shown rather than assumed when considering this link. The positive reaction profile obtained was discussed in terms of cultural factors dominant in Kinsey's time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#13,565,498
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,580
of 3,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,564
of 330,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#43
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.