| Title |
The presence of infectious extracellular Francisella tularensis subsp. novicida in murine plasma after pulmonary challenge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10096-007-0434-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J.-J. Yu, E. K. Raulie, A. K. Murthy, M. N. Guentzel, K. E. Klose, B. P. Arulanandam |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 20% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 33% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,570,428
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#799
of 2,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,862
of 156,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.