You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Photocatalytic degradation of selected herbicides in aqueous suspensions of doped titania under visible light irradiation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Hazardous Materials, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.02.055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela V. Šojić, Vesna N. Despotović, Nadica D. Abazović, Mirjana I. Čomor, Biljana F. Abramović |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 14 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#1,726
of 7,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,596
of 102,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#8
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.