↓ Skip to main content

Prospects and challenges for industrial production of seaweed bioactives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Phycology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
208 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
455 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospects and challenges for industrial production of seaweed bioactives
Published in
Journal of Phycology, September 2015
DOI 10.1111/jpy.12326
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeff T Hafting, James S Craigie, Dagmar B Stengel, Rafael R Loureiro, Alejandro H Buschmann, Charles Yarish, Maeve D Edwards, Alan T Critchley

Abstract

Large-scale seaweed cultivation has been instrumental in globalizing the seaweed industry since the 1950s. The domestication of seaweed cultivars (begun in the 1940s) ended the reliance on natural cycles of raw material availability for some species, with efforts driven by consumer demands that far exceeded the available supplies. Currently, seaweed cultivation is unrivaled in mariculture with 94% of annual seaweed biomass utilized globally being derived from cultivated sources. In the last decade, research has confirmed seaweeds as rich sources of potentially valuable, health-promoting compounds. Most existing seaweed cultivars and current cultivation techniques have been developed for producing commoditized biomass, and may not necessarily be optimized for the production of valuable bioactive compounds. The future of the seaweed industry will include the development of high value markets for functional foods, cosmeceuticals, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals. Entry into these markets will require a level of standardization, efficacy, and traceability that has not previously been demanded of seaweed products. Both internal concentrations and composition of bioactive compounds can fluctuate seasonally, geographically, bathymetrically, and according to genetic variability even within individual species, especially where life history stages can be important. History shows that successful expansion of seaweed products into new markets requires the cultivation of domesticated seaweed cultivars. Demands of an evolving new industry based upon efficacy and standardization will require the selection of improved cultivars, the domestication of new species, and a refinement of existing cultivation techniques to improve quality control and traceability of products.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 444 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 15%
Researcher 58 13%
Student > Bachelor 50 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 6%
Other 70 15%
Unknown 108 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 175 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 8%
Environmental Science 35 8%
Engineering 20 4%
Chemistry 12 3%
Other 48 11%
Unknown 127 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,896,109
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Phycology
#141
of 2,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,903
of 288,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Phycology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.