↓ Skip to main content

A new MRI tag-based method to non-invasively visualize cerebrospinal fluid flow

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
A new MRI tag-based method to non-invasively visualize cerebrospinal fluid flow
Published in
Child's Nervous System, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00381-018-3845-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Borzage, Skorn Ponrartana, Benita Tamrazi, Wende Gibbs, Marvin D. Nelson, J. Gordon McComb, Stefan Blüml

Abstract

Abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics can produce a number of significant clinical problems to include hydrocephalus, loculated areas within the ventricles or subarachnoid spaces as well as impairment of normal CSF movement between the cranial and spinal compartments that can result in a cerebellar ectopia and hydrosyringomyelia. Thus, assessing the patency of fluid flow between adjacent CSF compartments non-invasively by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has definite clinical value. Our objective was to demonstrate that a novel tag-based CSF imaging methodology offers improved contrast when compared with a commercially available application. In a prospective study, ten normal healthy adult subjects were examined on 3T magnets with time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (Time-SLIP) and a new tag-based flow technique-time static tagging and mono-contrast preservation (Time-STAMP). The image contrast was calculated for dark-untagged CSF and bright-flowing CSF. We tested the results with the D'Agostino and Pearson normality test and Friedman's test with Dunn's multiple comparison correction for significance. Separately 96 pediatric patients were evaluated using the Time-STAMP method. In healthy adults, contrasts were consistently higher with Time-STAMP than Time-SLIP (p < 0.0001, in all ROI comparisons). The contrast between untagged CSF and flowing tagged CSF improved by 15 to 34%. In both healthy adults and pediatric patients, CSF flow between adjacent fluid compartments was demonstrated. Time-STAMP provided images with higher contrast than Time-SLIP, without diminishing the ability to visualize qualitative CSF movement and between adjacent fluid compartments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Other 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 40%
Neuroscience 2 13%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,795,936
of 25,192,722 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#225
of 3,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,287
of 335,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#9
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,192,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.