↓ Skip to main content

Determination of the influence of stent strut thickness using the finite element method: implications for vascular injury and in-stent restenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Determination of the influence of stent strut thickness using the finite element method: implications for vascular injury and in-stent restenosis
Published in
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11517-009-0432-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Houman Zahedmanesh, Caitríona Lally

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 21%
Student > Master 34 19%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 37 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 105 59%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Materials Science 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 48 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#547
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,085
of 185,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.