You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
De novo mutation screening in childhood-onset cerebellar atrophy identifies gain-of-function mutations in the CACNA1G calcium channel gene.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1093/brain/awy145 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean Chemin, Karine Siquier-Pernet, Michaël Nicouleau, Giulia Barcia, Ali Ahmad, Daniel Medina-Cano, Sylvain Hanein, Nami Altin, Laurence Hubert, Christine Bole-Feysot, Cécile Fourage, Patrick Nitschké, Julien Thevenon, Marlène Rio, Pierre Blanc, Céline Vidal, Nadia Bahi-Buisson, Isabelle Desguerre, Arnold Munnich, Stanislas Lyonnet, Nathalie Boddaert, Emily Fassi, Marwan Shinawi, Holly Zimmerman, Jeanne Amiel, Laurence Faivre, Laurence Colleaux, Philippe Lory, Vincent Cantagrel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 7 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 72% |
| Scientists | 7 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
| Psychology | 10 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,227,131
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Brain
#2,367
of 7,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,000
of 344,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain
#49
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.