↓ Skip to main content

The segmented sieve of eratosthenes and primes in arithmetic progressions to 1012

Overview of attention for article published in BIT Numerical Mathematics, June 1977
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 202)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
The segmented sieve of eratosthenes and primes in arithmetic progressions to 1012
Published in
BIT Numerical Mathematics, June 1977
DOI 10.1007/bf01932283
Authors

Carter Bays, Richard H. Hudson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Researcher 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 20%
Computer Science 1 20%
Physics and Astronomy 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from BIT Numerical Mathematics
#26
of 202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,273
of 5,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BIT Numerical Mathematics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them