| Title |
Is Australian seaweed worth eating? Nutritional and sensorial properties of wild-harvested Australian versus commercially available seaweeds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-018-1530-2 |
| Authors |
Vanessa M. Skrzypczyk, Karen M. Hermon, Fernando Norambuena, Giovanni M. Turchini, Russell Keast, Alecia Bellgrove |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 44% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,582,911
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#42
of 2,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,045
of 343,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#3
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,631 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.