You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The many possible climates from the Paris Agreement’s aim of 1.5 °C warming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0181-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonia I. Seneviratne, Joeri Rogelj, Roland Séférian, Richard Wartenburger, Myles R. Allen, Michelle Cain, Richard J. Millar, Kristie L. Ebi, Neville Ellis, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, Antony J. Payne, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Petra Tschakert, Rachel F. Warren |
| Abstract |
The United Nations' Paris Agreement includes the aim of pursuing efforts to limit global warming to only 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels. However, it is not clear what the resulting climate would look like across the globe and over time. Here we show that trajectories towards a '1.5 °C warmer world' may result in vastly different outcomes at regional scales, owing to variations in the pace and location of climate change and their interactions with society's mitigation, adaptation and vulnerabilities to climate change. Pursuing policies that are considered to be consistent with the 1.5 °C aim will not completely remove the risk of global temperatures being much higher or of some regional extremes reaching dangerous levels for ecosystems and societies over the coming decades. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 144 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 12% |
| United States | 11 | 8% |
| Australia | 10 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 9 | 6% |
| France | 6 | 4% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Belgium | 4 | 3% |
| Austria | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 53 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 91 | 63% |
| Scientists | 45 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 346 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 64 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 10% |
| Professor | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 17% |
| Unknown | 79 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 62 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 57 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 6% |
| Engineering | 17 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 69 | 20% |
| Unknown | 103 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#274,103
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#15,234
of 98,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,931
of 343,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#309
of 926 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 926 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.