| Title |
The effect of habitat fragmentation on dispersal patterns, mating behavior, and genetic variation in a pika (Ochotona princeps) metapopulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, November 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004420050341 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary M. Peacock, Andrew T. Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Professor | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 64% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,774
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,403
of 29,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.