↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Acute Caffeine Ingestion on Endurance Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta–Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
146 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
6 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
476 Mendeley
Title
The Effect of Acute Caffeine Ingestion on Endurance Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta–Analysis
Published in
Sports Medicine, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40279-018-0939-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyle Southward, Kay J. Rutherfurd-Markwick, Ajmol Ali

Abstract

Caffeine is a widely used ergogenic aid with most research suggesting it confers the greatest effects during endurance activities. Despite the growing body of literature around the use of caffeine as an ergogenic aid, there are few recent meta-analyses that quantitatively assess the effect of caffeine on endurance exercise. To summarise studies that have investigated the ergogenic effects of caffeine on endurance time-trial performance and to quantitatively analyse the results of these studies to gain a better understanding of the magnitude of the ergogenic effect of caffeine on endurance time-trial performance. A systematic review was carried out on randomised placebo-controlled studies investigating the effects of caffeine on endurance performance and a meta-analysis was conducted to determine the ergogenic effect of caffeine on endurance time-trial performance. Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Caffeine has a small but evident effect on endurance performance when taken in moderate doses (3-6 mg/kg) as well as an overall improvement following caffeine compared to placebo in mean power output (3.03 ± 3.07%; effect size = 0.23 ± 0.15) and time-trial completion time (2.22 ± 2.59%; effect size = 0.41 ± 0.2). However, differences in responses to caffeine ingestion have been shown, with two studies reporting slower time-trial performance, while five studies reported lower mean power output during the time-trial. Caffeine can be used effectively as an ergogenic aid when taken in moderate doses, such as during sports when a small increase in endurance performance can lead to significant differences in placements as athletes are often separated by small margins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 146 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 476 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 79 17%
Student > Master 67 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 9%
Researcher 18 4%
Student > Postgraduate 17 4%
Other 52 11%
Unknown 201 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 120 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 3%
Other 33 7%
Unknown 221 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 288. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#122,982
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#113
of 2,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,708
of 343,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.