| Title |
Metabolic engineering of Aspergillus oryzae NRRL 3488 for increased production of l-malic acid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00253-013-5132-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen H. Brown, Lena Bashkirova, Randy Berka, Tyler Chandler, Tammy Doty, Keith McCall, Michael McCulloch, Sarah McFarland, Sheryl Thompson, Debbie Yaver, Alan Berry |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#3,054
of 8,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,048
of 213,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#20
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.