↓ Skip to main content

Is there an increased risk of spinal relapse in standard-risk medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor patients who receive only a reduced dose of craniospinal radiotherapy?

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Is there an increased risk of spinal relapse in standard-risk medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor patients who receive only a reduced dose of craniospinal radiotherapy?
Published in
Child's Nervous System, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00381-018-3842-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akıncı Burcu, Çetingül Nazan, Özdemir Özgür, Kamer Serra, Kantar Mehmet, Aksoylar Serap, Demirağ Bengü, Vergin Canan, Öniz Haldun, Kansoy Savaş, Turhan Tuncer, Akalın Taner, Ertan Yeşim, Kitiş Ömer, Anacak Yavuz

Abstract

Medulloblastoma (MBL) is the most common pediatric brain malignancy. Postoperative radiotherapy to the entire craniospinal axis is the standard-of-care but has linked to long-term morbidity. In this study, we analyzed the implication of reduced dose craniospinal radiotherapy (RT) for survival and pattern of relapse in MBL patients. The clinical characteristics of 32 consecutively diagnosed medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor patients were analyzed. After surgical resection, a dose of 23.4 Gy of spinal RT with a posterior fossa boost of 30.6 Gy was prescribed to standard-risk patients, whereas high-risk patients received 36 Gy spinal RT with additional boosts to the posterior fossa up to 54 Gy. Then, both groups received the same chemotherapy protocol. Five-year OS for standard and high-risk patients was 94 and 50%, respectively. When analyzing prognostic factors, postoperative tumor size is the most important one which affects the OS. Ten patients relapsed during follow-up, and there was no isolated spinal relapse in either group. The risk of isolated spinal relapse does not increase with reduced-dose craniospinal RT, since there is no isolated relapse in either the standard or high-risk groups of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Librarian 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,009,334
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#897
of 2,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,671
of 329,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#30
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,815 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.