↓ Skip to main content

Tissue engineering: use of scaffolds for ligament and tendon healing and regeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Tissue engineering: use of scaffolds for ligament and tendon healing and regeneration
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00167-009-0776-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Savio L‐Y. Woo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
South Africa 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Master 5 21%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Materials Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,570,428
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,022
of 2,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,324
of 94,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.