↓ Skip to main content

LIF-Dependent Signaling: New Pieces in the Lego

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
LIF-Dependent Signaling: New Pieces in the Lego
Published in
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12015-011-9261-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Emmanuelle Mathieu, Claire Saucourt, Virginie Mournetas, Xavier Gauthereau, Nadine Thézé, Vincent Praloran, Pierre Thiébaud, Hélène Bœuf

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 89 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Student > Master 10 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 15 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#400
of 1,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,511
of 122,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.