↓ Skip to main content

Revision of the taxonomic status of the genus Gloeoporus (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) reveals two new species

Overview of attention for article published in Mycological Progress, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Revision of the taxonomic status of the genus Gloeoporus (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) reveals two new species
Published in
Mycological Progress, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11557-018-1400-y
Authors

Paul Eunil Jung, Hyun Lee, Sheng-Hua Wu, Tsutomu Hattori, Michal Tomšovský, Mario Rajchenberg, Meng Zhou, Young Woon Lim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 25%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,570,428
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Mycological Progress
#172
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,553
of 328,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycological Progress
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them