↓ Skip to main content

Periodontal disease and systemic conditions: a bidirectional relationship

Overview of attention for article published in Odontology, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 233)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
437 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
529 Mendeley
Title
Periodontal disease and systemic conditions: a bidirectional relationship
Published in
Odontology, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10266-006-0060-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jemin Kim, Salomon Amar

Abstract

For decades, physicians and dentists have paid close attention to their own respective fields, specializing in medicine pertaining to the body and the oral cavity, respectively. However, recent findings have strongly suggested that oral health may be indicative of systemic health. Currently, this gap between allopathic medicine and dental medicine is quickly closing, due to significant findings supporting the association between periodontal disease and systemic conditions such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and osteoporosis. Significant effort has brought numerous advances in revealing the etiological and pathological links between this chronic inflammatory dental disease and these other conditions. Therefore, there is reason to hope that the strong evidence from these studies may guide researchers towards greatly improved treatment of periodontal infection that would also ameliorate these systemic illnesses. Hence, researchers must continue not only to uncover more information about the correlations between periodontal and systemic diseases but also to focus on positive associations that may result from treating periodontal disease as a means of ameliorating systemic diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 529 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 522 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 14%
Student > Bachelor 73 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 13%
Student > Postgraduate 51 10%
Researcher 42 8%
Other 85 16%
Unknown 132 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 233 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 6%
Engineering 10 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 2%
Other 54 10%
Unknown 150 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,524,923
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Odontology
#5
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,788
of 89,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Odontology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them