| Title |
TLC screening of thraustochytrid strains for squalene production
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-013-0080-x |
| Authors |
Atsushi Nakazawa, Yume Kokubun, Hiroshi Matsuura, Natsuki Yonezawa, Ryoji Kose, Masaki Yoshida, Yuuhiko Tanabe, Emi Kusuda, Duong Van Thang, Mayumi Ueda, Daiske Honda, Aparat Mahakhant, Kunimitsu Kaya, Makoto M. Watanabe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,823,605
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#222
of 2,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,365
of 198,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,568 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.