↓ Skip to main content

Windows of opportunity for physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Reviews, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Windows of opportunity for physical activity
Published in
Obesity Reviews, July 2015
DOI 10.1111/obr.12306
Pubmed ID
Authors

S J Street, J C K Wells, A P Hills

Abstract

Tackling increasing rates of obesity is likely to be a defining feature of health care over the next several decades. Adult obesity is a persistent and treatment-resistant problem. Consequently, an emerging theme in the literature is to commence prevention efforts earlier in the developmental time course. This view is based primarily on epidemiological data demonstrating a link between traits manifesting early during development and increased obesity risk in adulthood. Physical activity is a perennial factor in discussions of obesity prevention. However, the optimal timing and type of physical activity interventions to commence remains unclear. Critical developmental windows of plasticity may afford time-limited opportunities to shape body composition across the life course; however, physical activity has not been explicitly considered in these discussions. Although animal models suggest that physical activity commenced earlier in development has differential effects on obesity onset compared to physical activity commenced in adulthood, human research is lacking. In this conceptual review, we consider physical activity during critical developmental periods as a way to mitigate obesity risk later in life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Sports and Recreations 12 14%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 14 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,826,304
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Reviews
#1,361
of 2,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,200
of 278,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Reviews
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.