↓ Skip to main content

Differential proteomic analysis of mouse macrophages exposed to adsorbate-loaded heavy fuel oil derived combustion particles using an automated sample-preparation workflow

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Differential proteomic analysis of mouse macrophages exposed to adsorbate-loaded heavy fuel oil derived combustion particles using an automated sample-preparation workflow
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00216-015-8595-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara Kanashova, Oliver Popp, Jürgen Orasche, Erwin Karg, Horst Harndorf, Benjamin Stengel, Martin Sklorz, Thorsten Streibel, Ralf Zimmermann, Gunnar Dittmar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#6,601
of 9,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,921
of 277,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#77
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.