↓ Skip to main content

Making inroads into improving treatment of bacterial vaginosis – striving for long-term cure

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Making inroads into improving treatment of bacterial vaginosis – striving for long-term cure
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12879-015-1027-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catriona S. Bradshaw, Rebecca M. Brotman

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is one of the great enigmas in women's health, a common condition of unknown aetiology, which is associated with significant morbidity and unacceptably high recurrence rates. While it remains unclear whether BV recurrence is predominantly due to failure of current antibiotic regimens to eradicate BV-associated bacteria (BVAB) and biofilm, a failure of some women to re-establish a resilient Lactobacillus-dominant vaginal microbiota, reinfection from sexual partners, or a combination of these factors, it is inherently challenging to make significant inroads towards this goal. In this review, we will outline why BV is such a clinical and epidemiologic conundrum, and focus on several key approaches that we believe merit discussion and clinical research, including strategies to: i) prevent reinfection (partner treatment trials), ii) boost favourable vaginal Lactobacillus species and promote a Lactobacillus-dominant vaginal microbiome (hormonal contraceptive and probiotic trials) and iii) disrupt vaginal BV-associated biofilm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 183 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Other 17 9%
Researcher 17 9%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 49 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 7%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 53 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,545,360
of 24,769,082 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#368
of 8,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,645
of 268,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#11
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,769,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.