You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A quantitative framework for evaluating the impact of biodiversity offset policies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.005 |
| Authors |
I. Peterson, M. Maron, A. Moillanen, S. Bekessy, A. Gordon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 10 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Scientists | 8 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 22 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 18% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,331,243
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,851
of 6,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,754
of 344,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#28
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.