↓ Skip to main content

The National Cancer Institute's Community Networks Program Initiative to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities: Outcomes and Lessons Learned

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The National Cancer Institute's Community Networks Program Initiative to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities: Outcomes and Lessons Learned
Published in
Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, January 2015
DOI 10.1353/cpr.2015.0017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn L. Braun, Susan Stewart, Claudia Baquet, Lisa Berry-Bobovski, Daniel Blumenthal, Heather M. Brandt, Dedra S. Buchwald, Janis E. Campbell, Kathryn Coe, Leslie C. Cooper, Paula Espinoza, Ronda Henry-Tillman, Margaret Hargreaves, Aimee James, Judith Salmon Kaur, K. Viswanath, Grace X., Jeanne Mandelblatt, Cathy Meade, Amelie Ramirez, Isabel Scarinci, Sora Park Tanjasiri, Beti Thompson, Anissa I. Vines, Mark Dignan

Abstract

We describe reach, partnerships, products, benefits, and lessons learned of the 25 Community Network Programs (CNPs) that applied community-based participatory research (CBPR) to reduce cancer health disparities. Quantitative and qualitative data were abstracted from CNP final reports. Qualitative data were grouped by theme. Together, the 25 CNPs worked with more than 2,000 academic, clinical, community, government, faith-based, and other partners. They completed 211 needs assessments, leveraged funds for 328 research and service projects, trained 719 new investigators, educated almost 55,000 community members, and published 991 articles. Qualitative data illustrated how use of CBPR improved research methods and participation; improved knowledge, interventions, and outcomes; and built community capacity. Lessons learned related to the need for time to nurture partnerships and the need to attend to community demand for sustained improvements in cancer services. Findings demonstrate the value of government-supported, community-academic, CBPR partnerships in cancer prevention and control research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 16 27%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Social Sciences 10 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 17%
Psychology 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,229,642
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
#165
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,401
of 359,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.