↓ Skip to main content

Unorthodox methods for enhancing solvent production in solventogenic Clostridium species

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Unorthodox methods for enhancing solvent production in solventogenic Clostridium species
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00253-015-7166-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor Ujor, Christopher Okonkwo, Thaddeus Chukwuemeka Ezeji

Abstract

While production of biofuels from renewable resources is currently receiving increased attention globally, concerns on availability and sustainability of cheap substrates for their production are growing as well. Lignocellulose-derived sugars (LDS) remain underutilized and merit consideration as a key feedstock. Among other obstacles such as low yield and low solvent titer, mitigation of stresses stemming from lignocellulose-derived microbial inhibitory compounds (LDMICs) that severely impair cell growth and solvent production is a major area of research interest. In addition to attempts at developing LDMIC-tolerant strains via metabolic engineering to enhance utilization of LDS, unconventional approaches that elicit different metabolic perturbations in microorganisms to relieve solvent- and LDMIC-mediated stresses have been explored to increase solvent production from LDS. In this review, the impacts of metabolic perturbations including medium supplementation with glycerol; furfural and 5-hydroxymethyl furfural; allopurinol, an inhibitor of xanthine dehydrogenase; calcium (Ca(2+)) and zinc (Zn(2+)) ions); and artificial electron carriers, methyl viologen and neutral red, on butanol production are discussed. Although these approaches have brought about considerable increases in butanol production, both from LDS and defined glucose-based media, the modes of action for most of these perturbations have yet to be fully characterized. Better understanding of these mechanisms would likely inform development of LDMIC-tolerant, butanol-overproducing strains, as well as possible combinatorial application of these approaches for enhanced butanol production. Hence, delineating the underlying mechanisms of these perturbations deserves further attention.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Researcher 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 22%
Chemical Engineering 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Chemistry 2 6%
Materials Science 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,022,830
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,748
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,336
of 394,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#33
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.