↓ Skip to main content

Why are people with dengue dying? A scoping review of determinants for dengue mortality

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
15 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
Title
Why are people with dengue dying? A scoping review of determinants for dengue mortality
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12879-015-1058-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mabel Carabali, Libia Milena Hernandez, Maria Jose Arauz, Luis Angel Villar, Valéry Ridde

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Bhutan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 398 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 86 21%
Researcher 49 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 72 18%
Unknown 84 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 5%
Other 67 17%
Unknown 104 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,687,113
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#422
of 8,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,857
of 275,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#11
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.