↓ Skip to main content

Malignant Mesothelioma of the Tunica Vaginalis: Incidental Diagnosis of a Rare Condition

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Surgery, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Malignant Mesothelioma of the Tunica Vaginalis: Incidental Diagnosis of a Rare Condition
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12262-018-1778-4
Authors

Sameh Hany Emile, Mohamed Balata, Ahmed Hossam Elfallal, Mahmoud Abdelnaby

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,637,483
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Surgery
#377
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,591
of 329,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Surgery
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.