↓ Skip to main content

Management of adverse renal events related to alemtuzumab treatment in multiple sclerosis: a Belgian consensus

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurologica Belgica, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Management of adverse renal events related to alemtuzumab treatment in multiple sclerosis: a Belgian consensus
Published in
Acta Neurologica Belgica, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13760-017-0864-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Sprangers, D. Decoo, D. Dive, A. Lysandropoulos, L. Vanopdenbosch, C. Bovy

Abstract

Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody indicated for the treatment of adult patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with active disease. Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with alemtuzumab are at increased risk for autoimmune adverse events (thyroid disorders, immune thrombocytopenia, and renal disease). The use of alemtuzumab has been associated with the development of renal immune-mediated adverse events in 0.3% of patients in clinical trials in MS, which generally occurred within 39 months of the last administration. Both anti-GBM disease and membranous nephropathy have been associated with the use of alemtuzumab. Early detection is necessary to allow for early diagnosis and prevent adverse renal and patient outcomes. Through the implementation of the risk minimization measures, patients can be diagnosed, and treated if needed, early allowing for generally favorable outcomes. This important goal can be reached through health care professional and patient education, careful analysis of the monthly lab tests, and close collaboration between the patient, neurologist, and the nephrologist. This article presents the consensus of Belgian MS specialists and nephrologists on the practicalities of diagnosis, management, and treatment of alemtuzumab-associated renal adverse events based on good clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 18 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 44%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Psychology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2018.
All research outputs
#19,702,729
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurologica Belgica
#491
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,866
of 445,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurologica Belgica
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.