↓ Skip to main content

Improving the selection of feature points for tracking

Overview of attention for article published in Pattern Analysis and Applications, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 349)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Improving the selection of feature points for tracking
Published in
Pattern Analysis and Applications, June 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10044-004-0210-9
Authors

Zoran Živković, Ferdinand van der Heijden

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Master 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 65%
Engineering 3 18%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,863,403
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Pattern Analysis and Applications
#43
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,320
of 58,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pattern Analysis and Applications
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.