↓ Skip to main content

Performance and Practice Guideline for the Use of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in the Management of Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Performance and Practice Guideline for the Use of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in the Management of Breast Cancer
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2015
DOI 10.1245/s10434-015-4753-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis Holmes, A. Colfry, Brian Czerniecki, Diana Dickson-Witmer, C. Francisco Espinel, Elizabeth Feldman, Kristalyn Gallagher, Rachel Greenup, Virginia Herrmann, Henry Kuerer, Manmeet Malik, Eric Manahan, Jennifer O’Neill, Mita Patel, Molly Sebastian, Amanda Wheeler, Rena Kass

Abstract

The American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) sought to provide an evidence-based guideline on the use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in the management of clinical stage II and III invasive breast cancer. A comprehensive nonsystematic review was performed of selected peer-reviewed literature published since 2000. The Education Committee of the ASBrS convened to develop guideline recommendations. A performance and practice guideline was prepared to outline the baseline assessment and perioperative management of patients with clinical stage II-III breast cancer under consideration for NST. Preoperative or NST is emerging as an important initial strategy for the management of invasive breast cancer. From the surgeon's perspective, the primary goal of NST is to increase the resectability of locally advanced breast cancer, increase the feasibility of breast-conserving surgery and sentinel node biopsy, and decrease surgical morbidity. To ensure optimal patient selection and efficient patient care, the guideline recommends: (1) baseline breast and axillary imaging; (2) minimally invasive biopsies of breast and axillary lesions; (3) determination of tumor biomarkers; (4) systemic staging; (5) care coordination, including referrals to medical oncology, radiation oncology, plastic surgery, social work, and genetic counseling, if indicated; (6) initiation of NST; (7) post-NST breast and axillary imaging; and (8) decision for surgery based on extent of disease at presentation, patient choice, clinical response to NST, and genetic testing results, if performed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 17%
Other 15 15%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 27 28%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 51%
Engineering 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,627,259
of 23,905,714 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,656
of 6,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,443
of 266,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#34
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,905,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.