↓ Skip to main content

Raising Doubt in Letters of Recommendation for Academia: Gender Differences and Their Impact

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business and Psychology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 556)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
59 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
31 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Raising Doubt in Letters of Recommendation for Academia: Gender Differences and Their Impact
Published in
Journal of Business and Psychology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10869-018-9541-1
Authors

Juan M. Madera, Michelle R. Hebl, Heather Dial, Randi Martin, Virgina Valian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 23%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Professor 11 7%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 37 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 11%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Linguistics 6 4%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 42 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 523. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#48,973
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business and Psychology
#3
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,100
of 341,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business and Psychology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them