| Title |
Roles of Cyclophilins in Cancers and Other Organ Systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, February 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-004-7812-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qizhi Yao, Min Li, Hui Yang, Hong Chai, William Fisher, Changyi Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,276,851
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#495
of 4,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,122
of 141,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.