↓ Skip to main content

Ragnar Frisch and interior-point methods

Overview of attention for article published in Optimization Letters, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Ragnar Frisch and interior-point methods
Published in
Optimization Letters, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11590-014-0807-x
Authors

Olav Bjerkholt, Sjur Didrik Flåm

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 67%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,284,384
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Optimization Letters
#272
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,549
of 254,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Optimization Letters
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.