↓ Skip to main content

Only Follow-Up of Memory B Cells Helps Monitor Rituximab Administration to Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology and Therapy, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Only Follow-Up of Memory B Cells Helps Monitor Rituximab Administration to Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Neurology and Therapy, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40120-018-0101-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Lebrun, Mikael Cohen, Maria Alessandra Rosenthal-Allieri, Saskia Bresch, Sylvia Benzaken, Romain Marignier, Barbara Seitz-Polski, Michel Ticchioni

Abstract

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are identified as a spectrum of inflammatory demyelinating disorders involving the brain, spinal cord and optic nerves. These disorders require early diagnosis and highly active immunosuppressive treatment. Rituximab (RTX) has demonstrated efficacy in limiting relapse in NMOSD when using several administration schedules. We questioned if the CD19+ CD27+ memory B cell count was a more reliable marker to monitor RTX administration than the RTX plasma level and CD19+ B cell count. We analyzed 125 blood samples from 17 NMOSD patients treated with RTX and also measured the level of anti-aquaporine-4 antibodies (anti-AQP-4 Abs), human anti-chimeric antibodies to the murine fragment of RTX (HACA-RTX Abs), and the RTX concentration. The mean follow-up time of the cohort was 7.4 (2-16) years. All patients improved with a mean EDSS going from 4 (1-8.5) to 2.7 (1-5.5). The mean interval between RTX infusions was 9.6 months with identification of prolonged responders. Total CD19+ B cell detection with the routine technique did not correlate to re-emergence of CD19+ CD27+ memory B cells. The RTX residual concentration did not correlate with the CD19+ CD27+ memory B cell count or with anti-RTX antibody production. In contrast to total CD19+ cell, detected with the routine technique, CD19+ CD27+ memory B cells are a reliable marker for biological relapse and allow a decrease in the frequency of infusions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 21%
Other 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 28%
Neuroscience 7 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,009,334
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Neurology and Therapy
#259
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,478
of 329,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology and Therapy
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.