↓ Skip to main content

Quality of life in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
44 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of life in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, July 2015
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094864
Pubmed ID
Authors

S R Filbay, A G Culvenor, I N Ackerman, T G Russell, K M Crossley

Abstract

Physical and psychological impairments impacting quality of life (QOL) are common following ACL reconstruction. Rehabilitation alone is an effective alternative to reconstruction for some patients, warranting the investigation of QOL in ACL-deficient individuals. To report and compare QOL in ACL-deficient individuals with population norms and ACL-reconstructed groups, and investigate relationships between participant characteristics and QOL. Systematic review and meta-analysis. We systematically identified and methodologically appraised all studies reporting QOL in ACL-deficient individuals ≥5 years following ACL rupture. Knee-related and health-related QOL scores in ACL-deficient cohorts were compared to ACL-reconstructed groups using a random-effects meta-analysis. Descriptive comparisons were made with population norms. Eleven studies reported QOL in 473 ACL-deficient individuals, a mean of 10 (range 5-23) years following ACL rupture. Eight studies reported knee-related QOL using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score QOL subscale (KOOS-QOL); scores (mean±SD) ranging from 54±17 to 77±22 were impaired compared to population norms. Health-related QOL, measured with the SF-36 domain scores in five studies, was similar to population norms, but impaired compared to physically active populations. Meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in KOOS-QOL (mean difference (95% CI) 2.9 (-3.3 to 9.1)) and SF-36 scores (for all SF-36 domains except Vitality) between ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed groups. This systematic review found impaired knee-related QOL in ACL-deficient individuals ≥5 years after ACL rupture, compared to population norms. Meta-analysis revealed similar knee-related QOL in ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed groups, and no difference in health-related QOL scores for seven of the eight SF-36 domains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Unknown 329 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 15%
Student > Bachelor 46 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 9%
Researcher 27 8%
Other 21 6%
Other 65 20%
Unknown 93 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 17%
Sports and Recreations 43 13%
Engineering 8 2%
Unspecified 7 2%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 109 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2021.
All research outputs
#852,975
of 25,000,733 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#1,582
of 6,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,389
of 268,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#35
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,000,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.