↓ Skip to main content

Facial, vocal and musical emotion recognition is altered in paranoid schizophrenic patients

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatry Research, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facial, vocal and musical emotion recognition is altered in paranoid schizophrenic patients
Published in
Psychiatry Research, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Weisgerber, Nicolas Vermeulen, Isabelle Peretz, Séverine Samson, Pierre Philippot, Pierre Maurage, Catherine De Graeuwe D’Aoust, Aline De Jaegere, Benoît Delatte, Benoît Gillain, Xavier De Longueville, Eric Constant

Abstract

Disturbed processing of emotional faces and voices is typically observed in schizophrenia. This deficit leads to impaired social cognition and interactions. In this study, we investigated whether impaired processing of emotions also affects musical stimuli, which are widely present in daily life and known for their emotional impact. Thirty schizophrenic patients and 30 matched healthy controls evaluated the emotional content of musical, vocal and facial stimuli. Schizophrenic patients are less accurate than healthy controls in recognizing emotion in music, voices and faces. Our results confirm impaired recognition of emotion in voice and face stimuli in schizophrenic patients and extend this observation to the recognition of emotion in musical stimuli.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 44%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatry Research
#4,805
of 7,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,894
of 276,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatry Research
#136
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.