↓ Skip to main content

Suburban watershed nitrogen retention: Estimating the effectiveness of stormwater management structures

Overview of attention for article published in Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Suburban watershed nitrogen retention: Estimating the effectiveness of stormwater management structures
Published in
Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, July 2015
DOI 10.12952/journal.elementa.000063
Authors

Benjamin J. Koch, Catherine M. Febria, Roger M. Cooke, Jacob D. Hosen, Matthew E. Baker, Abigail R. Colson, Solange Filoso, Katharine Hayhoe, J.V. Loperfido, Anne M.K. Stoner, Margaret A. Palmer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 23%
Student > Master 16 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 31%
Engineering 10 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 8%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,108,167
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
#176
of 745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,068
of 274,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.